<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climbing2011 Gear Guide: Packs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climbing.com/gear/2011-gear-guide-packs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climbing.com</link>
	<description>Since 1970</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Gear Guide: Packs</title>
		<link>http://www.climbing.com/gear/2011-gear-guide-packs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climbing.com/gear/2011-gear-guide-packs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By John Connor<br>  Testers: DJ Black, Jenny Black, John Connor, William Grayson</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climbing.com/print/equipment/2011_gear_guide_packs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STUFF THIS PACK Four super-light climbing packs How should you carry your gear for a long rock climb with a big approach? Do you choose the behemoth backpack that swallows everything, and then leave it at the base? Or do you go with a teeny leader pack for climbing, and be forced to hike in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- begin article -->
<div><!--begin paragraph-->
<p><b><font size="3">STUFF THIS PACK       <br />  Four super-light climbing packs </font></b>   </p>
<p>How should you carry your gear for a long rock climb with a big approach? Do   you choose the behemoth backpack that swallows everything, and then leave it   at the base? Or do you go with a teeny leader pack for climbing, and be forced to   hike in and out with your <a href="/gear/rock-climbing/climbing-harnesses/" class="aim-internal-link">harness</a> on and gear jangling around the outside of the   thing? Fortunately, a third option exists: the stuffable pack. These designs have been   around in various forms for a while, but in recent years, more pack manufacturers   seem to have gotten serious about them. </p>
<p>The idea is simple: a pack that stuffs into its own pocket, small enough to clip   onto your harness when you don’t need it, yet large enough to swallow the day’s   necessities when you do. During the approach, you carry your <a href="/gear/" class="aim-internal-link">climbing gear</a> inside.   At the base, most everything inside goes on you—shoes, harness, rack—and the pack   clips to your harness or straps around your waist. Whoever’s climbing second carries   another pack with the water, snacks, jackets, and other essentials. The leader is   almost completely unencumbered. Once you’ve topped out, unstow your pack, load   all your non-descent gear into it, and off you go—without having the rack dangling   around your feet as you downclimb, and without having to return to the base of the   climb to retrieve anything. </p>
<p>There are other ways to use these packs, too. They’re so light that you might   choose to throw one in your big alpine or backpacking rig for overnight approaches   or ascending to a high camp. Then you can pull out the mini-pack for day climbs   or summit bids. Or, if you prefer to lead with a pack, some of these climb great but   weigh less than half as much as traditional leader packs. If all this sounds like a   multiple personality disorder for backpacks, it is. Nonetheless, we found four such   compact, multitasking machines.</p>
</p>
<p><!--end paragraph--></div>
<p>			  			  		  <a class="content-img-link" rel="group1" href="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-Vaude-UL-Comfort_31453.jpg"><img src="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-Vaude-UL-Comfort-200_31451.jpg" height="279" /></a>
<div><!--begin paragraph-->
<p><b>Best for Climbing<br />   VAUDE ROCK ULTRALIGHT COMFORT 15     <br />  $59.95, 14.1 oz.   <br />  <a href="http://www.vaude.com" target="_blank">vaude.com  </a></b><br />  With its tubular construction, this 15-liter pack bested the others reviewed for wearing while climbing. An external compression system snugs down around smaller loads, and an innovative clip on each side allows the compression cord to be easily strapped around a larger item, such as a picket or shovel handle. An internal slot holds the removable, foldable back pad, which doubles as a separate sit pad—the only pack in the review to have this feature. This pad helps provide structure without excessive weight or bulk; without the pad, the same slot works well as a hydration sleeve, albeit slightly too small for the largest bladders. The Vaude pack has an internal clip for keys or headlamp, and a spacious top pocket added extra stowage. The sewn-on waist belt and S-curve, mesh-backed shoulder straps, along with an air-channeling back-panel design, held the pack close to the back. During durability testing, two small holes appeared on the exterior.</p>
</p>
<p><!--end paragraph--></div>
<p>			  			  		  <a class="content-img-link" rel="group1" href="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-Camp-Phantom_31459.jpg"><img src="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-Camp-Phantom-200_31457.jpg" height="225" /></a>
<div><!--begin paragraph-->
<p>
<p><b>Light and Right   <br />  CAMP PHANTOM   <br />  $39.95, 9.2 oz.   <br />  <a href="http://camp-usa.com" target="_blank">camp-usa.com</a></b>  <br />  The lightest, cheapest, most compressible   pack in the review, the Phantom offers no   illusions about its intended purpose: anything   where speed, and thus light weight,   is of paramount importance. In spite of its   gossamer feel, the Phantom’s unexpectedly   high durability won it grudging praise   from testers. (As with other packs in the   review, hauling or chimney climbing are   not recommended.) With a wide-mouthed   clamshell design, this 15-liter pack features   internal hydration bladder straps, a   hose-routing system, and well-thought-out   external gear-stowing bungees. The pack   stuffs into the quick-access top pocket   and, when stuffed, includes a waist belt   for wearing while climbing. With its Vshaped   webbing-and-mesh waist harness,   the Phantom carried better than others,   making it a good choice for ski mountaineering   and alpine speed-climbing as well as toting up rock routes.</p>
</p>
<p><!--end paragraph--></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><!-- End: Ad Container --><br />		  			  		  <a class="content-img-link" rel="group1" href="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-Pata-LW-Pack_31465.jpg"><img src="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-Pata-LW-Pack-200_31463.jpg" height="231" /></a>
<div><!--begin paragraph-->
<p><b>Summit Bid   <br />  PATAGONIA LIGHTWEIGHT TRAVEL PACK   <br />  $79, 11.5 oz.   <br />  <a href="http://www.patagonia.com" target="_blank">patagonia.com</a></b>  <br />  Although this is clearly designed as a suitcasefriendly   adventure-travel pack, we felt it would make   an admirable summit pack, with a clean, streamlined   design. The Lightweight Travel Pack’s (LWT) twin ice   axe loops and daisy chains latched alpine tools to   its back with panache. Mesh pockets on either side   swallowed water bottles, a small camera case, or   easy-access snacks. A clip-in loop inside the interior   pocket makes this pack harness-portable when stuffed,   though the pack hangs widthwise, taking up valuable   racking space. (Not an issue stuffed inside another   pack, of course.) Thin, stuffable padding arranged in   a brick-wall pattern protects your back against hard   objects inside. A voluminous zippered top pocket and one-inch   fl at-webbing waist belt round out the feature set. The LWT’s dearth of   compression straps meant that the pack needed to be close to full in order to stay stable   on the back, and, as with the others, durability testing took its toll—this pack is not meant   for exposure to coarse alpine granite or other abrasive surfaces.   Near press time, Patagonia notified us that the 2011 version has been updated with   a new, polyurethane-coated, double-ripstop nylon fabric that’s both lighter and more   durable. That should make it even more useful as a super-light, stuffable mountaineering summit pack.</p>
</p>
<p><!--end paragraph--></div>
<p>			  			  		  <a class="content-img-link" rel="group1" href="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-TNF-Verto_31471.jpg"><img src="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GG-TNF-Verto-200_31469.jpg" height="255" /></a>
<div><!--begin paragraph-->
<p>
<p><b>Editors&#8217; Choice<br />  THE NORTH FACE VERTO <br />  26   $69, 13.3 oz.   <br />  <a href="http://www.thenorthface.com" target="_blank">thenorthface.com</a>  </b><br />  The 26-liter Verto wowed testers with its versatility and climbing prowess. An internal,   hanging essentials pocket acts as a stuff pouch with clip-in loop; the stuffed pack   hangs vertically and unobtrusively once on the harness. Under this pocket, a hydration   bladder clip helps keep your water stable. Though some bladders were incompatible,   carrying a bladder does add structure to the pack.   On the outside, a series of refl ective webbing loops runs the length of the front of   the pack. Used with the included reflective cord and barrel locks, these provide both compression   and external gear lashing options for large items such as a foam pad or pickets.   Two ice axe loops, combined with the removable Velcro shaft straps, function equally well   for technical tools or a mountain axe. On the back panel, twin webbing straps run the length   of the pack, adjustable via a ladderlock buckle and hidden behind a layer of nylon at the   contact point with the wearer’s back. This allows you to use the pack as a compression stuff   sack for your sleeping bag during approaches, and it found favor among testers for size and   load customization—key for a pack of this size. A zippered lid pocket with an integrated key clip   keeps snacks handy.   The Verto’s simple, 5/8-inch-webbing waistbelt is removable—the only pack in the review   with this feature. Shoulder straps consist of thinly padded nylon, adequate but not overly   supportive. Still, with its funnel-shaped design and thoughtful feature set, this pack won   confidence among the stuffable category for use during both approaches and descents, as   well as climbing on rock or mountain routes. As with other packs in the review, durability testing revealed weaknesses—do not haul this pack.</p>
</p>
<p><!--end paragraph--></div>
<p>			  			<!--begin horizontal line--><br />
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="horizontal1" width="100%" align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/s_31472.gif" border="0" width="1" height="1" alt=""></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><!--end horizontal line-->
<div><!--begin paragraph-->
<p><b>STRUCTURAL   SUPPORT   </b><br />  Ultralight packs usually have minimalist   suspension (shoulder straps,   hip belt, back panel), which is not   ideal when you choose to load one   up for an approach. To create more   structure inside a lightweight pack,   use the load itself. A rope, coiled to   fit against the pack’s back panel,   can help stabilize the rest of the   weight. So can a water bladder,   sitting straight up and down in the   center of the pack, with other items   packed around it. Even a pair of stiff   rock shoes, aligned similarly, can   make the pack more comfortable   and stable.   Here’s another go-light pack   option: Climb with a hydration pack.   It’s the comfiest way to carry a lot   of water, you can share the hose at   belays, and most hydration packs   have plenty of room to stuff in food   and rain shells.</p>
</p>
<p><!--end paragraph--></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><!-- End: Ad Container --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climbing.com/gear/2011-gear-guide-packs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 147/153 queries in 0.145 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 761/770 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static-dev-climbing.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.climbing.com @ 2012-12-13 06:02:23 --