Letters to the Editor - December 2005, No. 244
Climbing journalism lives!
Thanks for the excellent articles on the Russian Big Wall Project and Oak Flat’s threatened closure [September]. Beyond the quality of the writing and wealth of interesting information, I was particularly impressed with the objectivity of the reporting. Although some of us can’t forgive the calculated trashing of mountain wilderness by the Russian siege climbers or Sherman’s shameless corporate sellout, we at least got to hear sensitively presented arguments for their attitudes and behavior. It’s writing like this, particularly over the past couple of years, that has raised the quality of Climbing well beyond that of the other high-profile English-language mags devoted to the sport. Keep it coming.
— Dave Wachter, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Speaking of Russians
Thank you for the great, thorough, and balanced article “The Russian Way” by Mark Synnot [September]. It gave a lot of insight to the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian school, their ups and downs. The message that transpired was — in my point of view — excellent: Clean up, if you can, but really great achievements. Doing feats that are on the edge and maybe beyond might force you to cut some environmental corners, but only do so to be safe and survive.
One thing that I missed, though: a mention of Anatoli Boukreev’s astonishing alpine speed ascents. To my knowledge no one has made as many eight-thousanders as fast and in such a short time (Everest, Lhotse, Broad Peak, and Gasherbrum II from April 26 to July 14, 1997). If anyone was a product of the Soviet school, it must be Anatoli Boukreev.
— Hans Sorensen, Sygehuset, Greenland
A thousand (wrong) words
Thanks for the nice photos and the continued inspiration to get out as much as possible. I would take issue with the caption that accompanied the fine cover shot for the September issue, however. They say a picture is worth a thousand words, and while the photo [a climber on Mount Stuart’s North Ridge] is outstanding, the words you chose were way off base.
Having bivied a few hundred meters below those slabs I can assure you that were we to wake up to such fine weather in the Cascades we would have been ecstatic. What the climber is actually heading into is a fine day on some outstanding alpine granite with plenty of time and good weather to enjoy the route, make the summit, and descend Ulrich’s Couloir on the other side. Facing the North Ridge, as this image does, it’s obvious that this is early morning (light coming in from the left, or east) and the wispiness of the clouds suggest low-lying morning clouds or fog that is warming, rising, and likely to be burnt off in a matter of hours.
— Mike Endres/Wanderlust Photo, Pyongtaek, South Korea
ISN’T THAT CHEATING?
It was with curiosity that I noticed several new-appearing bolts next to a splitter crack in a photo of Todd Skinner free climbing Wet Denim Daydream [Gallery, October]. When I checked my guidebook, I didn’t see any bolts on the 15-foot roof crack on pitch eight (I’m assuming this is the pitch Skinner is climbing in the photo).
Then I read the issue more closely and saw mention in Hot Flashes that Skinner and Jim Hewett “added 15 protection bolts, including a few within reach of the aid line.” I’ve been climbing for over 15 years and I always thought that placing bolts next to splitter cracks was unacceptable by American climbers.I am very much a recreational climber, who will never free an old aid line, but I really question the tactics that Skinner and Hewett used, and I’m looking for an explanation.
— Steve Orr, Lakewood, Colorado
Editor’s note: It is generally not accepted
to add bolts to existing routes without the first-ascent party’s permission. Still, it happens. Jim Thornburg, who took that photo, reports to us that the thin crack and bolts actually shown in the picture are not on the exact aid line of Wet Denim Daydream, but on a short variation, which is typical of the many free-climbing bolts placed on Yosemite big walls.
Better than wood
Majka Burhardt [Tech Tip, September, page 94] notes that stove boards made of plywood are great for basecamp, but not for schlepping up a mountain. So why bother with it in the first place? For over 20 years my partners and I have been using a simple stove pad made from lightweight Ensolite and tin. Making one is simple: Cut a 12-by-24-inch piece of foam and a slightly smaller piece of lightweight tin (newspaper printing press tin works great). Round the corners so there are no sharp edges. Glue the tin to the foam using contact cement. Voilá — a super-lightweight stove pad. The tin adds rigidity yet can be bent to level out uneven surfaces, and the Ensolite insulates the stove much better than plywood.
The pad can be folded if necessary, but I typically just put it in my pack next to the back support before stuffing everything else in.
I have used a couple of pads like this on dozens of trips, including three trips up Denali.
— Allen Sanderson, Salt Lake City, Utah
Yikes!
Heinz Zak’s tale [“Reality Check,” October] recounting his spook-fest solo of the historic Separate Reality was riveting and strangely inspirational, akin to Derek Hersey’s hat trick day on the Diamond, John Gill’s early bouldery ascent of the Thimble (above the guardrail), and Scott Franklin’s groundbreaking solo of Survival of the Fittest (Gunks), not to mention Croft’s, Bachar’s, Potter’s, and Yabo’s additions to this illustrious genre. Although the dreadfully exposed Separate Reality (5.11d) is not cutting edge in difficulty as compared to other recent hard solos, it was one hell of a way for Zak to validate himself, albeit late in his already impressive career.
— Dan Levison, Boulder, Colorado
Just watch those Freudian slips
I am a Clinical Social Worker in beautiful Saint George, Utah, and I utilize bouldering in my therapy with adults and adolescents. Let me quickly relate one of my “sessions.”
I met one couple in the waiting room. The wife was upset and the husband was sitting on the opposite end of the couch, silent. The tension was thick. I quickly smiled and suggested we go to the “Oracle” (the name I’ve give to the bouldering area I take people to). I could tell that they were suspicious. I kept it a surprise, and just told them that the Oracle would teach them everything they needed to know about solving problems.
When we got to the boulders, I asked what they saw when they looked at the rock. “Holes, calcium deposits, dirt,” they replied. I pulled out my little bag of chalk and said, “This will help you.” “Cocaine??” he said. “No, it’s rock-climbing chalk.” They quickly connected. I explained the concept of bouldering and got them started.
She initially resisted, but quickly tasted success and got excited (and a few bruises, too). He was spotting her the whole time, and assisted with hints as to where to go next. We repeated the same process for him. At the end of the session I processed the whole thing with them, and told them to go home and solve their own problems with the tools the “oracle” taught them. Sure enough, when I saw them next week, they were excited to go bouldering again, and this time they were cheering for each other, and were on the same team. The problem was solved.
— Iuri Tiago Melo, CSW, St. George, Utah
Style is in the mind of the beauty, or something like that
Regarding Steve House’s comments on alpinism and recent Russian climbs in the Himalayas: Beauty is not contrived, whereas style is contrived. The two are in totally different realms. There is no connection between beauty and style. Style is merely a matter of personal preference. Style is psychological and so it’s a prison in effect. Beauty has nothing psychological about it.
Therefore, climbing in any style is to be disconnected from both beauty and from the mountain itself. Serious relationship cannot have any style to it, and so to the extent that alpinism is a style, it is false. Style pushes beauty out the door.
Beauty is always in relationship and so it’s the relationship of the climbers to the mountain that is crucial. Style is destructive in all ways. Unless these kinds of distinctions are made and kept in mind, then exchanges between climbers won’t get anywhere.
— Ted Gannon, Talkeetna, Alaska
The Web we weave
Just writing to say thanks for having the best website on climbing. I climbed a lot in the Boy Scouts, mainly rock gyms and bouldering. Here I am now, 23, recovering from a blood infection and knee injury. Rock climbing has been the best activity to rebuild some muscle tone and most of all, self-esteem. Thanks for all the great info.
— Kevin Davis, San Diego, California